Physics of Pool: Elastic Collision of Equal Masses

The final shot in the pool game is yours, but the cue and the eight ball aren’t nicely lined up with any of the pockets. Looking around, the closest pocket is 45 degrees off the line between the two balls. You take aim for a glancing blow, the cue ball strikes the eight ball…what happens next? Do you sink the eight ball? Which way does the cue ball end up going? And how can you make the eight ball go off in a different direction?

Pool is a great example of physics in action. After every collision, the momentum of all the balls—the product of their mass and velocity—has to be conserved. That is, the total momentum before the collision has to be the same as the total momentum after the collision. And, roughly speaking, the energy must be conserved as well; the balls can’t fling away from each other with more energy than you give them. These two laws—the conservation of energy and the conservation of momentum—work together to steer the balls around the table.
In this project, you’ll experiment with colliding masses, see how they collide, and maybe learn how to use physics to plan the perfect pool shot!

Problem

At what angle will two equal-mass balls move away from one another after a glancing collision?

Materials

• 2 low friction masses of equal weight (hover pucks orair hockey pucks would work best)
• Smooth, flat surface (if using a pool table, try placing a foam board overthe surface to reduce friction)
• Protractor
• Tape
• String

  Procedure

• Place one puck on the surface and mark its starting position with the tape.
• Place the second puck a foot or so away from the first puck.
• Gently push the second puck towards the first puck, aimed so that it hits the puck at a glancing angle rather than straight on (this may take a few practice runs).
• Mark a couple of points along the paths both pucks tookafter the collision.
• Using the marks as a guide, lay a lengthof string along each of the paths taken by the pucks.
• Use the protractor to measure the angle between the strings—the angle at which the pucks moved away from each other.
• Repeat steps 1-6 several times and calculate the average angle between the strings. If the puck doesn’t hit at a glancing angle, then just skip that attempt and try again.

Results

The angle between the pucks’ paths will be close to ninety degrees—a right angle.

Why?

In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. Momentum is given by mvand kinetic energy by ½mv², where m is mass and v is velocity. If ​​v_crepresents the velocity of the moving puck before the collision, ​​v_ais the velocity of the moving puck after the collision, and ​​v_bis the velocity of the stationary puck after the collision, then conservation of kinetic energy leads to:

½mv_c²=​½mv_a² + ​½mv_b²

Because all the masses are equal, the m’s cancel and you end up with:

v_c²=v_a^{2 +}v_b²

This equation has the exact same form as the Pythagorean Theorem, c² = a²+ b²​where a and b are the sides of a right triangle and c is the hypotenuse. This only works if v_aand v_bare at right angles to one another.

 
The conservation of momentum adds some depth (and complexity). Momentum is a little more complicated because it has to be broken down into components: the momentum along the original direction of motion (x) and momentum perpendicular to that direction (y). Momentum in both directions has to be conserved. Initially, all the momentum is in the x direction:

mv_cx = mv_ax + mv _bx

Canceling the masses, you end up with

v_cx = v_ax + v _bx

In the y direction, there is initially no momentum. To make everything balance, that means the y-direction momentums after the collision must perfectly cancel:

mv_cy = 0 = mv_ay + mv _by

0 = v_ay + v _by

v_ay = -v _by

Putting this together with the conservation of energy, you find that all the velocity components after the collision have the same magnitude, with the y components pointing in different directions. You end up with the final velocities pointing at right angles away from each other.
In an inelastic collision, kinetic energy is not conserved; some energy is lost to the surroundings. This means that, while the ycomponents of the velocity still have to cancel, the xcomponents can be different. The balls will no longer bounce away at right angles.
In reality, perfectly elastic collisions rarely happen; some energy is always lost. Collisions between subatomic particles (protons and electrons) are very nearly elastic; so are atoms in an ideal gas. Space probes that slingshot around a planet behave the same way as elastic collisions as well.

Going Further

What happens if you use pucks (or balls) with different masses? For example, if you’re using air hockey pucks, try making the stationary puck be two pucks stacked on top of one another. What changes?
What happens if you use a surface that isn’t smooth (for example, a carpet)? How does that change the angle? Is it less than or more than a right angle? Can you explain what you’re seeing using the equations mentioned above?

0

Evaluating Choice Blindness: Do You Know What You Want?

“Choice blindness” refers to the phenomenon where people are blind to their own choices or preferences and are able to validate decisions they did not actually ever make. This experiment will evaluate whether men or women are more likely to demonstrate choice blindness.

Problem:

This experiment will evaluate whether the phenomenon of “choice blindness” occurs more often with men or women.

Materials:

• Approximately 30 test subjects (15 men and 15 women)
• 20 photos of non-celebrity, unknown (to test subjects) males
• 20 photos of non-celebrity, unknown (to test subjects) females
• Notebook for recording results
  

  Procedure

• Recruit 15 male and 15 female adult test subjects.
• Print 20 photos of non-celebrity, unknown males and 20 photos of non-celebrity, unknown females. The photos should be headshots that are approximately the same size, zoom, brightness, etc.
• Present two male photos side by side and ask a female test subject to tell you which person she finds more attractive.
• Take both photos away and present her with her chosen photo. Ask her to tell you why she chose that image.
• Record her answer.
• Repeat steps 3-5 ten times with the female test subject using different pairs of faces each time. In three of the trials, however, exchange one face for the other after the test subject makes her choice. In these three trials, closely observe your test subject. Does she notice that she is presented with the photo that she did not choose? Is she able to give a reason why she chose that photo (even though she actually did not choose the photo)?
• Repeat this experiment withall of your male and female test subjects. For your male test subjects, use the non-celebrity, unknown female photos that you chose.
• Analyze your results. How many times were you able to fool your female test subjects by presenting them with photos they did not choose? How many times were the male test subjects fooled? What conclusions can you draw about choice blindness in men and women?

0